LawforAll

advocatemmmohan

My photo
since 1985 practicing as advocate in both civil & criminal laws

WELCOME TO LEGAL WORLD

WELCOME TO MY LEGAL WORLD - SHARE THE KNOWLEDGE

Thursday, February 1, 2018

whether the Administrator appointed in Probate proceedings qua the co-sharer's property in partition suit ,would have no locus in the present proceedings. = I am not in agreement with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Even if the co-sharer has taken away his share, any change in the shares in the partition suit would have an effect on the share represented by the Administrator in accordance with law.

1
ITEM NO.54               COURT NO.2               SECTION XVI
               S U P R E M E  C O U R T  O F  I N D I A
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)  No(s). 
36108-36110/2013
RADHA BAGREE  & ANR.                              Petitioner(s)
                                VERSUS
GHANSHYAM BAGREE  & ORS.                          Respondent(s)
Date : 04-01-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
                           [IN CHAMBER]
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kunal Chatterji, AOR
                 Ms. Maitrayee Banerjee, Adv.
Mr. Saurav Gupta, Adv.
 
For Respondent(s) Mr. Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad, Adv.
Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Adv.
Ms. Yugandhara Pawar Jha, Adv.
Ms. Mayuri Shukla, Adv.
                    Mr. Kunal Verma, AOR
                    Mr. Sarad Kumar Singhania, AOR
                    Mr. T. V. Ratnam, AOR
                    Mr. Mainak Bose, Adv.
Mr. M. Sowri Dev, Adv.
             
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                               O R D E R
An   application   for   intervention   is   filed   by   an
Administrator   appointed   in   Probate   proceedings   qua   the
co-sharer's   property   in   partition   suit   from   which   the
present   proceedings   arise.     It   is   the   say   of   the   learned
counsel   for   the   applicant   that   his   predecessor
Administrator was also heard during the proceedings.
On   the   other   hand,   learned   counsel   for   the
petitioners   states   that   the   earlier   Administrator   was   not
heard   in   partition   suit.     Learned   counsel   insists   and

2
persists that the Administrator would have no locus in the
present proceedings.  
I   am   not   in   agreement   with   the   submission   of   the
learned counsel for the petitioners.  
Even   if   the   co-sharer   has   taken   away   his   share,   any
change   in   the   shares   in   the   partition   suit   would   have   an
effect   on   the   share   represented   by   the   Administrator   in
accordance with law.
The   application   is   allowed   with   costs   against   the
petitioners   quantified   at   Rs.   5000/-(Rupees   Five   Thousand
only) payable to the applicant, to be payable in two weeks.
The   special   leave   petitions   being   of   the   year   2013,
be urgently processed for listing.
(DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (RAJINDER KAUR)
 AR-cum-PS  Court Master